Print Page | Contact Us | Sign In | Register
The Advocate
Blog Home All Blogs
The KBA Advocate is the weekly KBA legislative newsletter that contains up-to-date information on legislation that impacts your practice. It is only published when the legislature is in session and is sent to all KBA members electronically via the KBA Weekly.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: Author: Joseph N. Molina III  2019 Session  2019-20  legislature  budget  election  Brownback  Supreme Court  Judicial Branch  Court of Appeals  Gannon  Hard 50  Kansas Supreme Court  school finance  Special Session  2016 Session  2017 session  2017-18  Alleyne  fall legislative conference  Senate  Sine Die  State of the Judiciary  2019 Golf Tournament  Caleb Stegall  conference  election day  First Adjournment  HCR 5005  House of Representatives 

Sign Up Today!

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Monday, June 10, 2019
Updated: Friday, June 7, 2019

Sign up today!

Tags:  2019 Golf Tournament  Author: Joseph N. Molina III 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

2019 KBA Golf Tournament!

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Monday, June 3, 2019

Sign up today!

 Attached Thumbnails:

Tags:  2019 Golf Tournament  Annual Meeting golf  Author: Joseph N. Molina III  Topeka Country Club 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Sine Die 2019 -- UPDATE

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Thursday, May 30, 2019

The Kansas Legislature had one of the most memorable ends to a session in its history. The day began with Medicaid expansion supporters interrupting the Senate session by singing a hymn and chanting their support for healthcare. This led Senate leadership to clear the gallery, remove news reporters from the senate floor and lock the doors to the senate chamber. This is the first time I have ever seen this action taken. Reporters were told to clear the chamber or lose their press credentials. The chamber remained locked when senate proceedings resumed. It was an interesting start to the day. See; https://media.kansascity.com/livegraphics/2019/pdf/WagleLtr052919.pdf See also; https://www.cjonline.com/news/20190529/medicaid-expansion-supporters-drown-out-kansas-senate-proceedings. Here is a youtube video of the protest. Chants begin around 32:35 mark - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdzTSgJHV-4&app=desktop. A statement from Senate President Susan Wagle on this incident can be found on her twitter feed - https://twitter.com/SenatorWagle

When activities resumed, the Kansas Senate quickly confirmed Sarah E. Warner to the Kansas Court of Appeals. The final tally was 37-1. The sole “nay” vote was from Sen. John Doll (I-Garden City) who wanted to see a nominee from western Kansas. See; https://www.cjonline.com/news/20190529/kansas-senate-affirms-court-of-appeals-nominee-sends-signal-to-supreme-court

The Senate then approved a motion to remove SCR 1610 from the judiciary committee and refer it to the whole Senate. SCR 1610 is the proposed constitutional amendment that would replace the merit selection process for Supreme Court justices with the nominate/appoint model used for the Kansas Court of Appeals. SCR 1610 was approved 28-10.  See; http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2019_20/measures/vote_view/je_20190529124439_160305/

Sen. Masterson (R-Andover) made the initial motion, but declined to have a debate on the merits, at this time. His wants to have an interim committee review the process. No date has been set. It is likely that the issue will be sent back to Senate Judiciary in 2020 for hearings and debate.

Both chambers were able to pass another resolution dealing with natural disaster in Kansas. This will help with flooding and the recent tornado damages. HCR 5015 passed unanimously. See; http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2019_20/measures/hcr5015/

Both chambers were also able to override Gov. Kelly’s budget vetoes. The vetoes were bundled into one measure and passed the Senate 27-11, with the House approving the override 86-30. See; http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2019_20/measures/sb25/

 

Tags:  Author: Joseph N. Molina III  budget vetoes  HCR 5015  judicial appointment process  KS Court of Appeals  Medicaid expansion  Sarah E. Warner  SCR 1610 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Sine Die 2019

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, May 28, 2019

At 2:00 pm this afternoon—Tuesday, May 28th—the Kansas Senate Judiciary Committee will convene to discuss the nomination of Sarah E. Warner to the Kansas Court of Appeals. This position was vacated when Judge Patrick McAnany retired earlier this year.

This judicial confirmation hearing will be the first for Gov. Laura Kelly, although this is her second nominee for this position. As has been widely reported, Gov. Kelly’s initial nominee, Judge Jeffry Jack, failed to gain the needed support for the Kansas Senate. This after a quick ruling from the Kansas Supreme Court that the Jack nomination could not be withdrawn.

The Warner nomination will be voted on by the full Senate on Sine Die, May 29th. The Senate goes into session for Sine Die at 10:00 am.

The Senate may also attempt to vote on a constitutional amendment to alter the way judges are selected for the Kansas Supreme Court. Sen. Ty Masterson’s (R-Andover) motion to bring SCR 1620 to the Senate floor will take place tomorrow. This concurrent resolution would switch the selection method from merit selection to an appoint/confirm model. Some senators are anxious to change the merit selection method in response to the Jack nomination issues. Sen. Hensley (D-Topeka) would like to simply correct  KSA 20-3020 to include a withdrawal provision. How the Senate proceeds remains to be seen.

The issue before both chambers will be whether enough legislators return for Sine Die to vote on these issues and/or attempt to override Gov. Kelly’s tax bill veto and certain line item vetoes she made on the budget. See; https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article230703224.html

Normally, Sine Die is a formality and not much real business is undertaken. However, this year has been anything but “normal,” and a lot of issues remain up in the air at this moment. This could be a busy end to the session, or it could simply peter out. 

Tags:  2019 Session  Author: Joseph N. Molina III  Jeffry Jack  judicial confirmation  judicial selection  Sarah E. Warner  SCR 1620  Sine Die  Ty Masterson 

Share |
PermalinkComments (1)
 

Court of Appeals Confirmation

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Monday, May 13, 2019

UPDATE on Court of Appeals Confirmation

May 15, 2019

In less than 40 minutes, the Kansas Senate voted down the confirmation of Judge Jeffry Jack to the Kansas Court of Appeals. This was a foregone conclusion which was reflected by the unanimous vote. The negative vote was unanimous, 0-38. The debate focused largely on the process for selecting judges in Kansas. Sen. Rucker (R-Topeka) alluded to a change in that process to bring greater transparency to picking judges. Sen. Ty Masterson (R-Andover) previously made a motion to bring SCR 1620 to the Senate floor for a vote. The concurrent resolution would switch the selection method from merit selection to an appoint/confirm model. That vote is scheduled for Sine Die.

Sen. Hensley (D-Topeka) proposed amending KSA 20-3020 to include a withdrawal provision as was previously incorporated. He said the statute is unclear and should be corrected.

Sen. Wilborn (R-McPherson) prepared a letter to the Commission on Judicial Conduct setting out grievances against Judge Jack. The letter was available for any senator to sign and sponsor.

Immediately after the final vote, Gov. Laura Kelly nominated Sarah E. Warner to fill the Court of Appeals position. Sen. Wilborn set a judiciary committee meeting for May 28th, time and location to be announced later. A vote on the confirmation will take place on May 29th when senators return for Sine Die.

News articles covering the confirmation vote:

See; https://www.cjonline.com/news/20190514/kansas-senate-rejects-twitter-damaged-nominee-for-court-of-appeals

See; https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/kansas/articles/2019-05-14/the-latest-rejected-nominee-says-vote-discourages-service

See; https://www.kwch.com/content/news/Gov-Laura-Kelly-becomes-1st-in-Kansas-to-have-appeals-judge-rejected-509917901.html

See; https://www.kansascity.com/news/state/kansas/article230394659.html

 

Previously posted on May 13, 2019:

Last Friday, the Kansas Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the nomination of Judge Jeffry Jack to the Kansas Court of Appeals must be voted on by the Kansas Senate. 
See; http://kscourts.org/Cases-and-Opinions/opinions/SupCt/2019/20190510/121061.pdf

This decision comes after an expedited review of the nomination process to fill the Court of Appeal position vacated when Judge McAnany retired. The Court held that KSA 20-3020 does not allow the governor to withdraw a nominee once that nomination is made. The statute previously dealt with the withdrawal of a nominee, but that provision was removed when the statute was amended in 2013. The State argued that a general withdrawal provision found in KSA 75-4315b(c) was sufficient for the Jack withdrawal. However, the Court found that it could not rely upon this statute because it was not specific enough to the court of appeals confirmation statute to be binding. Furthermore, KSA 20-3020 provides only one way that an appointment can fail, and that is through a failed senate confirmation vote. The Court interpretation of withdrawal is analogous to nominees for elected office who die prior to an election. In those situations, the names had to remain on the ballot for that election.

The ruling does two things. First, it requires the Kansas Senate to vote on the Jack nomination because his withdrawal was improper. The Kansas Senate had 60 days to vote on the Jack nomination, and if my math is correct, that would mean they need to vote today, May 14th, 2019. If the senate fails to vote within the 60 days, the nomination becomes effective. The Kansas Senate anticipated this possibility and called a special meeting of the Senate to deal with it. The Jack nomination is anticipated to fail 40-0.

Second, once the Jack nomination fails, the process begins again, and Gov. Kelly may nominate other lawyers for the Court of Appeal positions. Gov. Kelly had previously nominated Sarah E. Warner for the spot, but that nomination was deemed invalid. As such, Kelly will have to re-nominate Warner or a lawyer of her choosing. It is anticipated that Kelly will nominate Warner again and request a hearing on Sine Die.
See; https://www.apnews.com/11e92702b1c549f7a1e7808fb2083b9c;
See also; https://www.wibw.com/content/news/KS-Supreme-Court-Appellate-Court-nominee-cant-withdraw-509769291.html;
See as well; https://www.salina.com/news/20190510/gov-laura-kellys-selection-of-next-court-of-appeals-judge-hangs-in-balance

Gov. Laura Kelly issued a press release as did Senate President Wagle.
See; https://governor.kansas.gov/statement-on-the-kansas-supreme-courts-decision-today/; See; https://twitter.com/SenatorWagle

One interesting fact about this case is that the KSAG was suing the Governor, Chief Justice and the Kansas Senate. Many believe this was the first time all three branches of government were named in a lawsuit.
See; http://kscourts.org/cases-and-opinions/dockets/Supreme-Court-Docket-May-09-2019-pm.pdf

Tags:  Author: Joseph N. Molina III  Court of Appeals nominations  Gov. Kelly nomination to Court of Appeals; Supreme  Jeffry Jack  Judge McAnany  KSA 20-3020  Sarah Warner  Senate Vote on Hon. Jeffrey Jack Nomination 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Veto Session Comes to an End

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, May 7, 2019

The 2019 Veto Session ended around 3:00 a.m. on Sunday, May 5th. However, there still could be serious business conducted on Sine Die, which is set for Wednesday, May 29th. See; http://www.kansaspublicradio.org/kpr-news/session-recap-kansas-democrats-wield-new-power-gop-leaders-thwart-medicaid-expansion

The Veto Session was four days of dramatic standstill action focused on a filibuster type maneuver by Medicaid Expansion proponents in the House. The plan was to hold the state budget hostage and force the Senate to debate the expansion bill the House passed in March. The initial votes saw the slimmest of majorities deny the passage of the budget. See; https://www.kwch.com/content/news/Kansas-House-rejects-budget-in-Medicaid-fight-509462811.html; See also; https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2019/05/03/us/ap-us-xgr-kansas-legislature-the-latest.html

This put pressure of leadership to break the expansion coalition by reworking the budget and removing key pieces which some of those expansion supporters wanted. That tactic failed with more that 80 no votes on that budget. However, after sitting around for most of Saturday, May 4th, the coalition finally broke and the floods gates opened. House Sub for SB 25 (state budget) passed 79-45. Many of the moderates in the expansion coalition flipped once it was obvious the budget would pass. See; http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2019_20/measures/sb25/

With the budget out of the way, both chambers set their sights on a tax cut bill. Gov. Kelly vetoed an earlier version of the tax cut which the legislature could not override. The legislature used the same bill number for the latest tax cut bill.  SB 22 would run about $240 million over three years. It would decouple the state from the feds on standard deductions starting in 2019, exempt foreign income starting in 2017, and ever so slightly reduce food sales tax burden. See; http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2019_20/measures/sb22/

There is a good chance Gov. Kelly vetoes this bill as well. The message would be to look at a comprehensive tax policy change in 2020.

Should Gov. Kelly veto SB 22, the legislature may attempt an override on Sine Die. The override vote may not be the only vote taken by the Kansas Senate on May 29th. Sen. Ty Masterson (R-Andover) made a motion to pull SCR 1610 from Senate Judiciary. This will allow a vote to alter the merit selection process for the Kansas Supreme Court. See; http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2019_20/measures/scr1610/

To appear on the ballot SCR 1610 would need 27 votes in the Senate and 84 votes in the House—a tall order for most legislative days—very difficult on Sine Die.

Finally, the Kansas Supreme Court will hear two other huge issues this Thursday, May 9th: the K12 lawsuit and the Court of Appeals hearing on selection of judges. The issues surrounding school finance are well document and many believe the new funding will end the lawsuit. The hearing on the Court of Appeals issue is also straightforward. It is a question of law. Who gets to pick? Gov. Kelly believes the pick remains with her (Kelly nominated KBA President Sarah E. Warner last week) while Senate President Susan Wagle believes the pick is now with Chief Justice Lawton Nuss. Chief Justice Nuss has recused himself from the proceeding and has no opinion on the matter.

You can find more information about the case here: http://www.kscourts.org/kansas-courts/supreme-court/Cases_of_interest/Cases/121061/default.asp

Tags:  Author: Joseph N. Molina III  budget  SB 22  school finance  SCR 1610  selection of appellate judges  sine die  tax bill  veto session 2019 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Veto Session 2019

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, April 30, 2019

On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 the Kansas Legislature returns for the wrap-up session, also known as Veto Session. Traditionally, the veto session is used to override any vetoes the governor may have signed after First Adjournment. These days, though, the Veto session is the time during which the state budget is finalized.

This year, the Kansas Legislature has only one thing that it MUST accomplish: passing a budget. However, several ancillary items will also be considered during this time period. First, there will likely be an attempt to work out a tax bill that reduces income taxes. Earlier in the session, the legislature passed SB 22, a large tax cut vetoed by Gov. Kelly. So far, there have been no attempts to override the Governor’s veto, but that could change.

There also could be a push to have the Kansas Senate debate and vote on Medicaid expansion. The House has already approved this measure, but Senate leadership is blocking the bill. Senate President Susan Wagle (R-Wichita) has offered an interim study on expansion which would kill the idea for 2019. Gov. Kelly has put on a full court press to get the proposal to the floor this session, but time is not on her side. Prior to First Adjournment, Sen. Hensley (D-Topeka) made a motion to pull HB 2066 out of committee. That would give proponents of expansion an opportunity to debate the bill. To pull the bill out of committee, they need 24 votes. However, to schedule floor debate, they need 27 votes—which is much more difficult.

Both chambers will likely try to pass a constitutional amendment to ban abortions. Last Friday, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled that the state Constitution protects a women’s right to make her own decisions regarding a pregnancy. The 6-1 majority decision (Justice Stegall dissenting) can be found here - http://kscourts.org/Cases-and-Opinions/opinions/SupCt/2019/20190426/114153.pdf

Prior to the ruling, conservative Republicans had introduced legislation that would have banned abortion in Kansas. That constitutional amendment (HCR 5004) was co-sponsored by 21 Kansas Representatives. See; https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article225209525.html The Hodes & Nauser v. Schmidt case will only intensify the push for a vote on the issue. The Veto Session will provide ample opportunity for that. A successful constitutional amendment requires two-thirds of both chambers. That means 84 representatives and 27 senators need to approve the proposal. The House party split is 84-41; the Senate party split is 28-11-1

KSAG Derek Schmidt issued a press release on the topic. See; https://ag.ks.gov/media-center/news-releases/2019/04/26/ag-derek-schmidt-statement-on-today's-kansas-supreme-court-decision-in-hodes-nauser-v.-schmidt

The National Review also opined on the topic. See; https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/bloody-kansas/?fbclid=IwAR2NwXoEqOFmOerq9-FipJo-kS5SQekX2EV2PrQaCjy1s1SGW5HHBcxaU9k

The KS Supreme Court will hear two cases—school finance and the Court of Appeals appointment process—on May 9th.  The Gov. signed a school finance plan which adds $90 +/- million to hopefully end the school finance lawsuit. The Court will also hear arguments about the Kansas Court of Appeals selection process and who gets to choose the 14th Court of Appeals judge on May 9th. See; https://www.cjonline.com/news/20190412/gop-senate-president-seeks-lawsuit-to-settle-court-nomination-conflict

With all this work pending and two large cases in front of the Kansas Supreme Court, it is unlikely that the veto session will be brief. The 90th session day is set for May 17th, but there is a chance legislators will blow past that date if things get interesting.

Finally, the Kansas Legislative Research Department has released two of its three legislative summaries. These break down all the bills signed into law. These summaries also indicate when these new laws will go into effect.

 You can find the first two summaries here:

The third and final summary will be released after the Veto Session concludes.

Tags:  2019 session  2019-20  Author: Joseph N. Molina III  legislature  veto session  veto session 2019  Weekly20190430 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

April Break

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Monday, April 15, 2019

The Kansas Legislature is off for the majority of April, but there are still things to report. First, Gov. Kelly continues to sign bills into law. Just last week, she signed 16 bills on a variety of issues. These new laws will affect DCF, utility rate studies, state banking code, local government elections, and the number of school safety drills performed each year. This week, the Governor will likely continue to sign bills into law, including CCR for HB 2039, dealing with tribal judgments and the Kansas LLC Act.

Senate President Susan Wagle also made the news last week when she requested that KSAG Derek Schmidt file a lawsuit over the Kansas Court of Appeal nomination—or in her opinion—the lack thereof. In the nine-page letter, Sen. Wagle requested KSAG Schmidt seek a court ruling on whether Gov. Kelly can nominate another person to the court of appeals, or if the statute requires that Chief Justice Nuss make the appointment. Some believe that Gov. Kelly forfeited her opportunity to make the nomination when she withdrew Judge Jeffry Jack from consideration. Others believe that the Jack nomination counts, and she should have another chance to select. This is an ongoing issue which appears headed to the courts.

It should also be noted that Sen. Ty Masterson (R- Andover) introduced a constitutional amendment to replace the Supreme Court Nominating Commission with the same process used for the Kansas Court of Appeals.

SCR 1610    Constitutional amendment revising article 3, relating to the judiciary; allowing the governor to appoint supreme court justices and court of appeals judges, subject to senate confirmation; abolishing the supreme court nominating commission.

On a related note, the election for the 2nd Congressional District member to the Kansas Supreme Court Nominating Commission is underway. Only lawyers who reside within the 2nd Congressional District and who have properly registered to vote with the Supreme Court Clerk are eligible to vote in this election. See; KSA 20-170. The KBA has introduced legislation to remove that barrier for lawyers who want to vote in those elections; that bill has stalled in the Kansas House. See; HB 2020. As such, the process continues under current law.

  • There are seven lawyers are on the ballot for this election. They include:
    • Sara S. Beezley, Pittsburg
    • Terrance J. Campbell, Lawrence
    • Heather R. Cessna, Lawrence
    • Shaye L. Downing, Lawrence
    • J. David Farris, Atchison
    • Jason P. Hoffman, Topeka
    • Michael F. Kagay, Topeka
  • Lawyers who are qualified to vote in this election should have already received a ballot in the mail.
  • Please follow the instructions and return the ballot and the signed certificate to the Kansas Supreme Court on or before May 15, 2019.

Tags:  2019 session  2019-20  2nd District election to KS Supreme Ct. Nominating  Author: Joseph N. Molina III  candidates for KS Supreme Ct. nominating commissio  CCR for HB 2039  KS Court of Appeals nominations 

Share |
PermalinkComments (1)
 

Conference Committee Reports

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Monday, April 8, 2019

The Judiciary Conference Committee spent the majority of the last week bundling bills in order to pass several bills at once. These bundled bills are found in conference committee reports. The difficulty this session was the lack of bills in conference, or bills passed by both chambers but in different forms. This year, there were only six bills in conference, but more than 30 bills up for debate.

The Judiciary Conference Committee prioritized these six bills in conference, and created packages dealing with crime and punishment, contracts, courts, consumer protection, business entities and public agencies.

Crimes, Punishment and Criminal Procedure – CCR for SB 18

The bill in conference was SB 18, which includes amendments to the crime of counterfeiting currency (SB 134), access to pre-sentence reports (SB 19), out-of-state convictions (HB 2048); drug abuse treatment programs (HB 2396); penalties for involuntary manslaughter and child abuse (SB 108); mitigating factors when victim is an aggressor (HB 2283); and domestic violence notifications policies for LEO (HB 2279).  The CCR for SB 18 was adopted by the House 123-0. The Senate plans to discuss this CCR during veto session.

Consumer Protection – CCR SB 78

The bill in conference was SB 78 which deals with assignment of certain rights and benefits under an insurance policy for real property. It adds protections relating to housing for victims of domestic abuse (SB 150).  CCR for SB 278 passed both chambers (100-23/36-1) and now heads to the governor.

Courts – SB 20

The base bill in this CCR is SB 20 which extends the judicial branch docket fee surcharge. Under current law, the extension expires or sunsets after two years. The Senate removed this provision while the House maintained it. In conference, both sides agreed to place a six-year sunset provision in law. The committee also added language recognizing tribal court judgments in district court (HB 2039). The KS House passed this CCR 120-3. The Senate plans to take it up during Veto Session.

Public Agencies – CCR HB 2290

The bill in conference was HB 2290 which creates the victim’s compensation division within the KSAG. The committee added language concerning background checks for individuals who have unsupervised access to children and the elderly (HB 2360); exceptions to the KS Open Records Act (HB 2137); creation of the criminal justice reform commission (HB 2108); deferring the implementation of scrap metal database until July 1, 2021 (SB 219) and creating the Kansas closed-case task force to investigate hits on CODIS (SB 102). This CCR has not yet been drafted.

Other Bills

The Judiciary Conference Committee was unable to include some bills in conference committee reports this session. Those bills held over include:

  • HB 2336 - Clarifies when  jail credit is awarded to offenders under supervision of the secretary of corrections. (124-0) (From House Corrections) (Heard in Senate Judiciary, No Action Taken)
  • HB 2244 - Creates an affirmative defense to the crime of possession of a controlled substance for possession of certain medical treatments. (House Vote 89-35) (From House Judiciary) (Not Heard in Senate)
  • HB 2034 - Enacts the supported decision-making agreements act to provide a statutory framework for adults who want decision-making assistance.(101-15) (House Federal and State Affairs)
  • HB 2281 - Provides that a court order modifying a criminal sentence only modifies the portion of the sentence referenced by the court and not remaining portions of the original sentence. (102-22) (House Judiciary) 

Tags:  2019 session  2019-20  Author: Joseph N. Molina III  committee reports  conference committee  reports 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

First Adjournment

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Monday, April 1, 2019

The Kansas Legislature will reach First Adjournment today, April 5th. This deadline effectively kills any bill not already passed by at least one chamber. Of course, there are exceptions, and those are very similar to those used after Turnaround (House Appropriations, Senate Ways & Means, Tax etc.). The Legislature will return on May 1st for Veto Session. 

•  Judicial Branch Budget

The Kansas Judicial Branch has asked for budget enhancements totaling $20.1 Million. These enhancements include judicial raises ($7.8 million); nonjudicial raises ($10.3 million), and 7 new judges/staff with 20 unfunded positions ($2.0 million)

House Appropriations would like to phase in the increases over several years. The phase-in would begin in FY 2020 and last three years for staff and five years for judges.

Senate Ways & Means will discuss judicial pay during Veto Session.

The Judicial Branch Budget can be found on page 5 of the bill explainer for House Sub for SB 25. This bill is in conference and being negotiated.

       1.  SB 25   Appropriations for FY 2019/2020/2021 and 2022 for various state agencies

The Judicial Branch also gained approval for its docket fee extension bill. That bill, SB 20, has passed both chambers (35-5 in the Senate/118-6 in the House), but the KS House amended the bill to include HB 2039, recognizing Tribal Court Judgments.

SB 20 accounts for $9 million dollars of the judicial branch budget. It has been sent to conference committee to debate the differences. The Senate appointed Sen. Wilborn, Sen. Miller and Sen. Rucker. The House should appoint, Rep. Patton, Rep. Carmichael and Rep. Ralph.

       2.  SB 20   Extending the Judicial Branch Surcharge

The Judicial Branch was also able to get approval for HB 2211. This bill allows judges to waive driver’s license reinstatement fees should the defendant qualify due to manifest hardship. The hope is this program will provide an incentive those with traffic fines to apply for the waiver and pay a percentage of the fine minus penalties. The Judicial Branch believes this will end with a net positive impact on the judicial branch budget.

       3.  HB 2211    Allowing judges to waive or reduce driver license reinstatement fees

 

  • Merit Selection Proposals

For most of the session, merit selection was not an issue. However, with the nomination and subsequent withdrawal of Judge Jeffry Jack for the Kansas Court of Appeals, things have changed.  The first proposal is similar to previous judicial selection constitutional amendments. This bill would eliminate the merit selection process and move towards a “governor nominate/senate confirm model.” This proposal was introduced by Sen. Ty Masterson (R-Andover).

       1.  SCR 1610    Constitutional amendment revising article 3, relating to the judiciary; allowing the governor to appoint supreme court justices and court of appeals judges, subject to senate confirmation; abolishing the supreme court nominating commission.

Rep. John Barker (R-Abilene) introduced a constitutional amendment in the House that would require the Supreme Court to issue opinions within a year of hearing the case.

       2.  HCR 5010    Constitutional amendment to require the Kansas supreme court to issue decisions within one year of final arguments

Neither of these proposals have been scheduled for hearings

Sen. Dennis Pyle (R-Hiawatha) introduced a resolution calling for the resignation of Judge Jack. That resolution has no legal effect but does keep the issue alive. The Senate did not take up the issue.

       3.  SR 1731    Calling for the immediate resignation of District Court Judge Jeffry Jack of the 11th Judicial District

The Kansas Legislature has less than a week to complete its work. A state budget and a school finance plan have yet to be negotiated. The House passed some school finance policy proposals but failed to pass a funding plan. The Senate passed a funding plan. How this shakes out will be interesting to see.  Both chambers must also finalize a budget this week. The budget conference committee has already met but just to deal with some less controversial issues. 

Tags:  2019 session  2019-20  Author: Joseph N. Molina III  First Adjournment  First Adjournment 2019 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 1 of 20
1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  >   >>   >|