Print Page | Sign In | Register
Kansas Legal Breaking News
Blog Home All Blogs

EO 20-52: Requiring Masks or Other Face Coverings in Public

Posted By Ryan Purcell, Tuesday, June 30, 2020
Updated: Thursday, July 2, 2020

Governor Laura Kelly has signed a new Executive Order NO. 20-52 requiring most Kansans wear a mask while in public places. The order starts Friday, July 3, at 12:01 a.m.

View Executive Order

For news and COVID updates from the Governor visit https://governor.kansas.gov/newsroom/press-releases/ or https://covid.ks.gov/

Tags:  Author: Ryan Purcell  COVID-19  executive order  face coverings  masks  state 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Supreme Court amends Kansas eCourt Rules

Posted By Ryan Purcell, Tuesday, June 16, 2020
Updated: Wednesday, June 17, 2020

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 16, 2020

Contact:
Lisa Taylor
Public Information Director
785-640-7997
taylorl@kscourts.org

Supreme Court amends Kansas eCourt Rules

TOPEKA—The Kansas Supreme Court has amended Rules 20 through 24, known collectively as the Kansas eCourt Rules.

The amendments took effect June 12 and apply in district courts using the new centralized case management system and will apply in other courts as they begin using the system.

The courts now using the centralized case management system include:

  • 8th Judicial District—Dickinson, Geary, Marion, and Morris counties.
  • 21st Judicial District—Clay and Riley counties.

The amendments are included in Administrative Order 2020-RL-064.

Changes under Rule 21: Definitions

The term "filing user" has been amended to make clear this does not include any judicial branch employees, judges, temporary judges assigned to a case, retired judges or justices assigned to a case, or current Court of Appeals judges or Supreme Court justices acting in their official capacities.

The added term "transcript" means any written verbatim record of a court proceeding or deposition.

Change under Rule 22(d): Inaccessible Documents

Using the public portal to the new centralized case management system, the public has access to many more documents than compared to the FullCourt system it is replacing.

But criminal complaints and warrants are treated differently under the centralized case management system. An arrest warrant, search warrant, or bench warrant that has not been executed is not accessible to the public using the centralized case management system's public access portal.

Comments related to this rule clarify that:

  • A criminal complaint is not sealed, even if a proposed arrest warrant is filed at the same time or an arrest warrant is pending. The criminal complaint is available to the public unless a court order previously sealed it.
  • An arrest warrant, search warrant, or bench warrant is available to the public once the return confirming the warrant was served is filed, unless a court order previously sealed it.

Change to Rule 23(a): Filing User's Obligations

The requirement to certify compliance with Rule 24(b) does not apply to those exempted from the amended definition of "filing user" in Rule 21(l).

Change to Rule 23(b): Filing Under Seal

A case or document may be sealed only if a specific court order or a statute or Supreme Court rule requires it.

Comments related to Rule 23(c): District Court Clerk Processing of an eFiled Document

The person filing a document is solely responsible for filing it correctly.

Comments clarify that Rule 23(c)(1) applies to a document filed in an existing case when the district court clerks must match the county designation, the names of the parties in the case caption, and the case number.

Change under Rule 24(b): Personally Identifiable Information

The name of a minor who is not a named party in a case must be excluded from a pleading filed with the court unless an exception in Rule 24(c) is met. Similarly, a filing must exclude the name of a person whose identity could reveal the name of a minor who is not a named party in a case.

Change under Rule 24(c): Exceptions

An exception to personally identifiable information includes any information in a transcript.

Comments were added to Rule 24 to clarify:

  • Information a filer reasonably believes is necessary or material under the exception in (c)(4) means the information is needed for the document to make sense or for its proper processing, or is information requested on a Kansas Judicial Council form.
  • If the use of initials to protect personally identifiable information is unwieldly, the first name and first initial of the last name may be used, in addition to the use of a generic identifier or a pseudonym.
  • If an exception in Rule 24(c) applies, then the information is no longer considered personally identifiable information. For example, "the physical address of an individual's residence" is considered personally identifiable information under Rule 24(b)(1); but if a law requires the physical address of an individual's residence be provided, then the address may be stated and is no longer treated as personally identifiable information.

Tags:  Author: Ryan Purcell  COVID-19  eCourt  Kansas Supreme Court  state  Supreme Court 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Chief justice announces new administrative orders regarding safe operation of courts

Posted By Ryan Purcell, Tuesday, June 16, 2020
Updated: Wednesday, June 17, 2020

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 16, 2020

Contact:
Lisa Taylor
Public Information Director
785-640-7997
taylorl@kscourts.org

Chief justice announces new administrative orders regarding safe operation of courts

TOPEKA—Chief Justice Marla Luckert today announced two new administrative orders regarding the safe operation of Kansas courts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

"Kansas courts continue to take steps to protect the health and safety of court users, employees, and judges," Luckert said. "People often have little or no choice but to attend court, so we need to do what we can to make sure the court environment is as safe as possible."

Court capacity and distancing

In Administrative Order 2020-PR-076, the Kansas Supreme Court updates requirements for safely operating both district and appellate courts. It replaces Administrative Order 2020-PR-054 issued May 1, although it keeps in place many of its requirements for courts opening their facilities to the public.

It lifts the 10-person limit for courtrooms and the 12-person limit for panels seated for jury selection, as long as each person has at least 6-feet of social distancing.

Workspaces must also provide social distancing for each worker or have other protections in place that have been approved by a local public health official.

The Supreme Court still requires the capacity of any court hearing room not exceed the number of people who can be accommodated with 6-feet of social distancing.

In-person hearings

Courts are now allowed to conduct in-person hearings, if appropriate social distancing requirements are met. The Supreme Court continues to encourage that matters be heard as much as possible through video or audio conferencing.

Jury trials may only proceed when necessary to protect the constitutional speedy trial rights of a defendant. Best practices for safely conducting jury trials are being developed by an Ad Hoc Jury Task Force the chief justice established earlier this month.

Remote hearings and time suspensions

Administrative Order 2020-PR-075, also signed today, extends orders the chief justice entered since March under 2020 House Substitute for Senate Bill 102. These orders suspend statutory time requirements and allow courts to conduct two-way audio and video hearings in place of requiring people to report to court.

The Legislature amended Senate Bill 102 during the recent special session as part of 2020 Special Session House Bill 2016—the Legislature's extensive COVID-19 bill. The chief justice's order clarifies that her orders continue under the new legislation but that her orders authorizing courts to conduct hearings with two-way telephonic or electronic audio-visual communication are no longer tied to the Governor's state of disaster emergency declarations.

Tags:  Administrative Order  Author: Ryan Purcell  COVID-19  state 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

District of Kansas Issues Two New COVID-19 Related Administrative Orders

Posted By Ryan Purcell, Monday, June 15, 2020

On June 12, 2020, Chief Judge Julie A. Robinson issued two new administrative orders related to the COVID-19 public health crisis: Administrative Order 2020-9 In Re: Consent and Signature on Documents Filed in Criminal Actions During the COVID-19 Public Emergency; and, Administrative Order 2020-10 In Re: Transition Plan for Civil and Criminal Hearings During Pandemic. Administrative Order 2020-10 does not address the resumption of civil or criminal jury trials. The Court will decide when to resume jury trials at a later date.

Additional information regarding the district’s response to the pandemic can be found on the Court’s District of Kansas COVID-19 Information page.

Tags:  Administrative Order  Author: Ryan Purcell  Chief Judge Julie A. Robinson  COVID-19 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Supreme Court Accepting Comment on Amendment to Rule on Individual Attorney Course Approval

Posted By Ryan Purcell, Friday, May 29, 2020
Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Administrative Order 2020-8: Comments requested by Federal Court on compassionate release

Posted By Ryan Purcell, Friday, May 29, 2020
Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Chief justice issues five administrative orders affecting court operations during pandemic

Posted By Ryan Purcell, Friday, May 29, 2020

See 5 orders under Supreme Court administrative orders related to COVID-19 May 27, 2020

Administrative Orders Related to COVID-19

Tags:  administrative order  Author: Ryan Purcell  courts  COVID-19  KS Supreme Court  OJA  state 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

EO 20-20 Concerning Remote Notaries has Been Reissued; Governor signs disaster declaration, calls for special session, warns of grave consequences to state without legislative action

Posted By Ryan Purcell, Tuesday, May 26, 2020
Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Kansas Courts Press Release: 10th Judicial District to join statewide centralized case management system

Posted By Meg Wickham, Thursday, May 7, 2020

TOPEKA—The Kansas Supreme Court announced today the 10th Judicial District will join the state's other judicial districts and the appellate courts on a new centralized case management system that will transform the way state courts serve the people of Kansas.

Read the entire press release here.

 

Tags:  Author: Meg Wickham  COVID-19  state 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Kansas Courts Press Release: Chief Justice seeking comment on suspension of deadlines

Posted By Meg Wickham, Thursday, May 7, 2020

Kansas Supreme Court Chief Justice Marla Luckert is accepting public comment until Wednesday, May 20, 2020 on next steps related to current orders suspending deadlines and time limitations in judicial proceedings. Read full press release here.

 

Tags:  Author: Meg Wickham  courts  COVID-19  ks courts  state 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 2 of 6
1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6