KBA opposes governor-controlled nominating commission for Kansas appellate judges
Friday, May 17, 2013
(0 Comments)
Posted by: Beth Warrington
(May 14, 2013) TOPEKA, Kan.—The Kansas Bar Association’s Board
of Governors met Tuesday, May 14, via teleconference to consider and
vote on a proposal put forward by key legislators in both the Kansas
House and Senate that gives the governor the authority to appoint five
members to the nine-member Supreme Court Nominating Commission.
Twenty-eight of the 30 members of the board, which represents attorneys
from across Kansas, participated in the conference. The participating
members unanimously opposed the proposal as the latest attempt to change
the merit selection process of the Kansas Supreme Court. The Board of
Governors believes the proposal brought before them allowed the
executive branch of Kansas’ government too much control over the
judicial branch and represented a serious violation of the separation of
powers.
Under the legislators’ proposal, the five gubernatorial appointees
would serve at the governor’s pleasure, not under terms of service as
they do now. In addition, any nominee would also be subjected to a
Senate confirmation process that could potentially delay the filling of
vacancies if the legislature was not in session at the time a nominee
was named.
"The KBA membership has been and is strongly in favor of merit
selection for the Kansas Court of Appeals and Supreme Court,” said KBA
President Lee Smithyman, an attorney in Overland Park. "Because of that
strong preference, the KBA leadership has worked tirelessly with the
current administration and legislature to address criticisms of the
present system while preserving the benefits of merit selection. The KBA
will continue to solicit input from its members on this issue and
remains committed to a fair and reasonable merit-based method for
selecting appellate court judges.”
For nearly 60 years Kansas has used the merit selection system for
selecting its Supreme Court justices and enjoys one of the most highly
regarded appellate judiciaries in the United States. Currently, the
governor appoints justices from the recommendations of the nominating
commission, which is composed of citizens and lawyers from across the
state. Through this process, justices are chosen because of their
ability and their integrity, eliminating political favoritism that may
occur in gubernatorial appointments or the need for judicial candidates
to raise political contributions in direct elections. In addition,
justices are subjected to a retention vote every six years with judicial
performance reviews by Kansas citizens.
###
Contact:
Lee Smithyman, Esq.
President, Kansas Bar Association
Email: lee@smizak-law.com
Phone: (913)661-9800
The Kansas Bar Association, a 7,000 member voluntary association of
lawyers in Kansas, has a long tradition of favoring merit selection.
|
Follow Us