Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Register
KBA Search
The Advocate
Blog Home All Blogs
The KBA Advocate is the weekly KBA legislative newsletter that contains up-to-date information on legislation that impacts your practice. It is only published when the legislature is in session and is sent to all KBA members electronically via the KBA Weekly.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: legislature  Brownback  budget  Supreme Court  Gannon  Hard 50  judicial branch  Special Session  2016 Session  2017 session  2017-18  Alleyne  Court of Appeals  Kansas Supreme Court  school finance  Senate  State of the Judiciary  Caleb Stegall  election  HCR 5005  legislators  merit selection  Montoy  opening  2014 Session  2015 Session  2015-16  annual  Brown v. Board of Education  Call to Action 

Kansas Legislature Reaches First Adjournment

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013

The Kansas legislature has ended the regular legislative session and has left for their spring break. The plan is to return Wednesday, May 8 for the Veto Session, which is a week later than usual. Sen. Anthony Hensley questioned the extended break when he stated that he "thinks that was intentionally set up that way so that they could participate in their leadership roles in the ALEC organization, which to my way of thinking is inappropriate that we would schedule the Kansas legislature, legislative business around when ALEC meets.” See http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2013/apr/08/hensley-says-republican-leaders-delayed-wrapup-ses/.

 

Nevertheless, Monday, May 13 will be the 80th day. Normally the session runs for 90 days, but this year there has been a move to shorten the session to save money. However, keeping to this 80-day session will be difficult since both chambers are still haggling over the budget and tax policy, neither of which are anywhere near completion. See http://www.kansas.com/2013/04/07/2750861/lawmakers-have-much-to-weigh-over.html.

 

Both chambers will also need to deal with the Consensus Revenue Estimates set to become public on Friday, April 19. If these estimates for FY 2014 are in the red, legislators will need to increase funding, most likely in the form of sales tax extension. If the Kansas House lacks the votes to keep the sales tax cutting spending is the only answer left to them. And cutting would probably start with higher education since the Kansas Senate’s budget only calls for a 2 percent cut while the Kansas House chops 4 percent.

 

Keeping the sales tax at its current level is a major budget policy for the governor, but last week the Kansas House voted down a tax bill that contained the sales tax piece. See http://www.kansas.com/2013/04/05/2749009/kansas-house-votes-overwhelmingly.html. It was mostly political posturing but the vote was instructive because it showed a less than willing appetite for more taxes.

 

Besides working on the budget, the Kansas legislature spent the past week debating, amending, and then passing a number of conference committee reports. These reports contain a number of likeminded issues that are bundled together and passed as one piece of legislation. This process is the epitome of legislative sausage making. Some of the more discussed conference committee reports contained a series of abortion prohibitions, gambling, gun right protections, KDOT and Turnpike merger, and prevailing wage issues.

 

See Sweeping abortion bill sent to governor, http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2013/apr/05/sweeping-abortion-bill-sent-governor/; and Kansas abortion legislation life begins and fertilization, http://cjonline.com/news/2013-04-06/kansas-abortion-legislation-life-begins-fertilization.

 

See gaming bill, http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2013_14/measures/sb215/; Senate gambling compromise dies, http://cjonline.com/news/2013-04-02/senate-gambling-compromise-dies; and Measure to lure casino to SE Kansas fails, http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2013/apr/03/measure-lure-casino-se-kansas-fails/.

 

See Concealed Carry Bill – Conference Committee Report HB 2052, http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2013_14/measures/documents/ccrb_hb2052_01_0001.pdf. See also http://cjonline.com/news/2013-04-05/conceal-carry-gun-expansion-passes-legislature and http://cjonline.com/blog-post/tim-carpenter/2013-04-03/esu-student-wary-knoxs-confidence-firepower-0.

 

In addition, KDOT/Turnpike Merger – Conference Committee Report on HB 2234, http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2013_14/measures/documents/ccrb_hb2234_02_turnpike.pdf. See Modified merger of KTA-KDOT approved, http://cjonline.com/news/2013-04-05/modified-merger-kta-kdot-approved; and House, Senate send bill to Brownback that would make KDOT secretary in charge of operating turnpike, http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2013/apr/05/house-senate-send-bill-brownback-would-make-kdot-s/.

 

Here are some of the issues that are on their way to the governor’s desk:

  • HB 2253, major prolife bill passes legislature. The main prolife legislation of the 2013 Kansas legislature was approved Friday, April 5 by the House affirming that life begins at conception and prohibiting the use of tax money for abortion.
  • SB 61, legislature takes aim at human trafficking. This bill creates the crime of "commercial sexual exploitation of a child.
  • SB 16, Kansas gets its own RICO law. There is a federal anti-racketeering act known by the acronym RICO. Now, Kansas has its own version aimed at street gangs and drug distributors.
  • HB 2234, closer tie between KDOT, Turnpike backed. Gov. Sam Brownback proposed the merger of these two entities as a way to save money. On Friday, April 5 the legislature passed a bill tying the two agencies closer together, giving the governor a partial win.
  • HB 2252, law eliminates time limit on rape cases. Gov. Sam Brownback signed a bill into law Monday, April 1 that abolishes the statute of limitations on the prosecution of rape cases.
  • SB 124, restraint of trade act. The bill would create a new section that would declare the purpose of the new section and the amendments to existing sections is to clarify and reduce uncertainty or ambiguity in the application of the KRTA and applicable evidentiary standards to certain business contracts, agreements, and arrangements that are not intended to unreasonably restrain trade or commerce and do not contravene public welfare.

The KBA has tracked the following bills:

  • SB 81, requiring the restriction of certain officials' information from publicly accessible records. This bill was amended on the House floor and recommended for passage. This bill passed the Kansas Senate 40-0 (KBA supports this bill).
  • HB 2014, revoking an ex-spouses inheritance rights upon divorce, and HB 2015, marital property. Both bills have been recommended favorable for passage by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Passage is probable (KBA supports both bills).
  • HB 2166, medical assistance recovery act, was passed as amended by the Kansas House. The KBA Title Standard Committee provided the amending language that Rep. Blaine Finch used to clarify the lien priority status. The Kansas House approved this bill 112-11 (KBA was neutral on this bill but for the floor amendment).
  • HB 2205, adoption hearings, time and waiver of notice, passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee and was placed on the Senate Consent Calendar as an uncontroversial bill. Passage appears imminent (The KBA supported this bill).
  • HB 2398, relating to the Kansas revised limited liability company act, was given a hearing on Monday, March 18 but the House Judiciary Committee will hold this bill over to 2014 (The KBA introduced this bill).

For more information and to find other bills please review the updated Bill Tracking Chart at http://bit.ly/KBABillTrackingChart.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Governor Signs Merit Selection Reform Bill

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, April 2, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Legislators had a short week as they push toward First Adjournment, which is set for April 5. Both chambers continue to hammer out budget details and try to figure out a tax plan that will cover the projected budget hole. The real telling point of the state’s fiscal health is the April Consensus Revenue Estimates. Presently the executive branch is taking a "prepare for the worse, hope for the best approach” when they discuss the FY 2014 budget. The governor’s staff has already come out with a statement saying that failure to pass the sale’s tax extension will lead to further cuts. See http://bit.ly/cjonline_brownback_salestax.

 

On Wednesday, March 27, Gov. Sam Brownback signed HB 2019, which reforms the method of selecting Kansas Court of Appeal judges. This action makes Kansas only the third state in the country to have dual methods of selecting its appellate level judges and justices. See http://bit.ly/judicialselection_nj.

 

HB 2019 becomes effective on July 1, 2013. The governor will be able to appoint a judge to the Court of Appeals later this year should funding for the 14th judge be approved by the legislature. At the present moment there appears to be enough money to make this happen.

Quick Take:

Attendees included (l-r): Sen. Julia Lynn (R-Olathe); Rep. Shanti Ghandi (R-Topeka); Rep. Mark Kahrs (R-Wichita); Hon. Anthony Powell; Rep. Jerry Lunn (R-Overland Park); Speaker of the House Ray Merrick (R-Stillwell); Gov. Sam Brownback; Sen. Greg Smith (R-Overland Park); Sen. Steve Fitzgerald (R-Leavenworth); Rep. Charles Macheers (R-Shawnee); Rep. Lance Kinzer (R-Olathe); Rep. Keith Esau (R-Olathe); Sen. Mitch Holmes (R- St. John); Secretary of State Kris Kobach; Rep. John Rubin (R-Kansas City); Rep. Troy Waymaster (R-Luray); and Sen. Terry Bruce (R-Nickerson).

 

The governor held a press conference prior to the bill signing and it may be viewed at http://bit.ly/brownback_pressconf. You may also view the press release online at http://bit.ly/brownback_pressrelease.

 

Reaction to the first bill signing of the 2013 session has been quick. The following articles discuss the change to merit selection:

Besides the bill signing the KBA has been tracking conference committee work this week. The KBA continues to monitor the budget conference committee, which will determine if attorney registration fees are swept into the state general fund (SGF), if docket fees will be swept into the state general fund, if the Kansas Judicial Council will be fully funding (current recommendations is to cut 30K for FY 2014 and FY 2015), and to determine how e-filing is funded (with SGF funds or attorney registration fees).

 

In addition, the KBA is tracking the Judiciary Conference Committee as they work through the following bills:

  • HB 2204, dealing with redemption of real property;
  • SB 20, dealing with poverty affidavits;
  • HB 2164, relating to citizen grand juries and jury service;
  • SB 122, dealing with electronic service of process; and
  • SB 124, pertaining to the Kansas restraint of trade act.

The KBA is also tracking the Senate Judiciary and House Corrections Conference Committee as they work through bills dealing with criminal acts. Please be advised that these bills primarily deal with sentencing grid, statute of limitations of rape cases, and all the death penalty bills.

 

KBA-sponsored or supported bills include:

  • SB 81, requiring the restriction of certain officials' information from publicly accessible records was amended on the House floor and recommended for passage, and passed the Kansas Senate 40-0 (KBA supports this bill).
  • HB 2014, revoking an ex-spouses inheritance rights upon divorce, HB 2015, marital property. were recommended favorable for passage by the Senate Judiciary Committee; passage is probable (KBA supports both bills).
  • HB 2166, medical assistance recovery act, was passed as amended by the Kansas House. The KBA Title Standard Committee provided the amending language that Rep. Blaine Finch used to clarify the lien priority status and the Kansas House approved this bill 112-11 (KBA was neutral on this bill but for the floor amendment).
  • HB 2205, adoption hearings, time and waiver of notice, passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee and was placed on the Senate Consent Calendar as an uncontroversial bill; passage appears imminent (KBA supported this bill).
  • HB 2398, relating to the Kansas revised limited liability company act, was given a hearing on Monday, March 18 but the House Judiciary Committee will hold this bill over to 2014 (KBA introduced this bill).

For more information and to find other bills please review the updated Bill Tracking Chart at http://bit.ly/KBABillTrackingChart.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

First Adjournment in Sight

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013
This was a busy week for the legislature as each chamber worked on their versions of the budget and tax plans. On Tuesday the House passed out their version of a tax plan with the Senate waiting till Thursday to pass their budget. The differences are significant and each chamber will need to negotiate a final budget with an ending balance of 7.5 percent. The Kansas House will look to keep the 4 cents of the penny sales tax that was to expire on June 30, 2013, to back fill the Kansas Department of transportation. This is a revenue increase to help fill the income tax hole created in 2012. It has become tradition to use the Kansas Department of Transportation as a piggy bank to shore up state general funds, and many were concerned that this was an end around to accomplish just that. But in the end the House decided that keeping 4 cents and scuttling the remaining 6 cents while cutting certain income tax deductions was the best course of action to take. The Senate tax plan raises $316 million in FY 2014 by keeping the 1-cent sales tax and phasing out income tax deductions. The Senate version also has income tax cuts.

Quick Take:

On Monday, March 25 the KBA, and the Kansas County and District Attorney Association will co-host the second Lunch and Learn with Lawyer-Legislators at the Kansas Capitol. This event allowed lawyer-legislators to receive 1.0 hour of CLE credit without leaving the Capitol. Many thanks to the Capitol staff and to Rep. Rob Bruchman for making this event possible.

 

First Adjournment is literally right around the corner. The legislature will work on the floor till Wednesday then take a four-day weekend, returning on Monday to finish out the session. Budget and tax work will be pushed off till the Veto Session, which begins on May 8.

 

The KBA has been following several bills and their current statuses are as follows:

  • SB 81, requiring the restriction of certain officials' information from publicly accessible records, was amended on the House floor and recommended for passage and passed the Kansas Senate 40-0 (KBA supports this bill);
  • HB 2014, revoking an ex-spouses inheritance rights upon divorce, and HB 2015, marital property, both bills have been recommended favorable for passage by the Senate Judiciary Committee and passage is probable (KBA supports both bills);
  • HB 2166, medical assistance recovery act, was passed as amended by the Kansas House 112-11. The KBA Title Standards Committee provided the amending language that Rep. Blaine Finch used to clarify the lien priority status. (KBA was neutral on this bill but for the floor amendment);
  • HB 2205, adoption hearings, time and waiver of notice, passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee and was placed on the Senate Consent Calendar as an uncontroversial bill; passage appears imminent. (KBA supported this bill); and
  • HB 2398, relating to the Kansas revised limited liability company act, was given a hearing on Monday, March 18 but the House Judiciary Committee will hold this bill over to 2014. (KBA introduced this bill).

In addition, post-turnaround hearings focus on state budget issues. For the next several weeks we can anticipate a number of bills that set up fiscal budgets for various state agencies and for the Judicial Branch. These bills include:

  • SB 218, entire amount of docket fees shall be credited to the judicial branch docket fee fund, created in this bill, with certain exceptions. Extending the judicial branch surcharge for two years (KBA supports the surcharge but is neutral on docket fee reorganization);
  • HB 2338, judicial branch docket fee;
  • HB 2377, relating to court fees and cost, judicial branch surcharge fund (KBA supports the surcharge); and
  • judicial budget subcommittee report.

Also of interest is HB 2384, on July 1, 2013, all new hires and state agency attorneys, supervisors and positions that perform information technology functions are unclassified; certain exceptions. This bill was recommended favorable for passage by the Committee on Appropriations.

 

Senate Sub. for HB 2141, concerning public funds, lobbyists, was recommended for passage by the Committee on Ethics, Elections and Local Government. Originally this bill would have prohibited the use of public funds to lobby the legislature or to pay for membership dues to an association that lobbies the legislature. This language was struck and replaced with a reporting requirement. This new language can be found at http://bit.ly/SubforHB2141_ReportingLobbyist.

 

For more information and to find other bills please review the updated Bill Tracking Chart at http://bit.ly/KBABillTrackingChart.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

HB 2019 on its way to the Governor's Desk

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Last week saw several very large issues come up for debate in both chambers. The Kansas House worked and passed three gun rights bill, including one allowing open carry in the Capitol. The Kansas Senate debated the tax bill, which included the extension of the sales tax. But for lawyers the most significant vote came on Wednesday when the Kansas Senate voted to pass HB 2019. As we can all recall, HB 2019 eliminate s the current method for selecting Court of Appeal judges and replaces it with the federal model of governor appoint with consent of the senate. HB 2019 made its way to the Senate floor after bypassing the hearing stage in the Kansas Senate. Sen. Jeff King (R-Independence) carried the bill, which was passed on a final action vote of 28-12. HB 2019 is on pace to be the first bill signed into law this year. This issue has received a fair amount of statewide attention. Attached are a few editorials, letter to the editors, and news articles on the topic.

Quick Take:

HB 2019 was passed by the Kansas Senate 28-12. Below is report of how each senator voted on this very important KBA issue.

On roll call, the vote was: Yeas, 28; Nays, 12:

Yeas: Abrams, Apple, Arpke, Bowers, Bruce, Denning, Donovan, Fitzgerald, Holmes, Kerschen, King, Knox, LaTurner, Longbine, Love, Lynn, Masterson, Melcher, O'Donnell, Olson, Ostmeyer, Petersen, Pilcher-Cook, Powell, Pyle, Smith, Tyson, and Wagle.

Nays: Emler, Faust-Goudeau, Francisco, Haley, Hawk, Hensley, Holland, Kelly, McGinn, Pettey, V. Schmidt, and Wolf.

In addition to efforts to reform the judicial system the Kansas Senate has been working on its tax package. The big issues are the sales tax increase, home mortgage interest deductions, and real estate tax deductions; The Senate voted to keep the sales tax at it current level. This was a major change from the position staked out three years ago when the sales tax increase went into effect. Eleven senators who voted against the sales tax when it was first passed voted to keep it this time around. See http://cjonline.com/news/state/2013-03-14/sixteen-gop-senators-flip-support-elevated-sales-tax.

 

However, the Senate did agree to a tiered reduction of the home mortgage interest deduction and keep the charitable contributions deduction. The Kansas House is not as amenable to keep the sale’s tax at its current level and they look to deal with budget shortfalls by transferring funds from TWorks project in KDOT. More work will need to be done before a final budget is reached. Look for across the board cuts to higher education and various state agencies. Please keep in mind that this does not account for any additional spending in K-12 and if the Supreme Court upholds the recent Gannon decision the Legislature will have to find an additional $400 million. Mediation on the Gannon case will take place this fall.

 

The KBA has been following several bills and their current statuses are as follows:

  • SB 81, requiring the restriction of certain officials' information from publicly accessible records, passed out favorable by the House Judiciary Committee last week with the addition of language from SB 60. (KBA supports this bill);
  • HB 2014, revoking an ex-spouses inheritance rights upon divorce, and HB 2015, marital property, received a hearing on Thursday, March 14. It was well received by the Senate Judiciary Committee and should be discussed in the coming days. (KBA supports both bill);
  • HB 2205, adoption hearings, time and waiver of notice, is set for a hearing at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, March 19, 2013, in Room 346-S (KBA supports this bill); and
  • HB 2398, relating to the Kansas revised limited liability company act, is set for a hearing at 3:30 p.m. on Monday, March 18, 2013, in Room 112-N. The KBA drafted this proposal after a yearlong review process.

In addition, post-turnaround hearings focus on state budget issues. For the next several weeks we can anticipate a number of bills that set up fiscal budgets for various state agencies and for the Judicial Branch. These bills include:

  • SB 218, entire amount of docket fees shall be credited to the judicial branch docket fee fund, created in this bill, with certain exceptions. Extending the judicial branch surcharge for two years (KBA supports the surcharge but is neutral on docket fee reorganization);
  • HB 2338, Judicial Branch docket fee; and
  • HB 2377, relating to court fees and cost, judicial branch surcharge fund (KBA supports the surcharge); and; Judicial Budget subcommittee report.

Also of interest is HB 2384, on July 1, 2013, all new hires and state agency attorneys, supervisors and positions that perform information technology functions are unclassified; certain exceptions. What HB 2384 would do is convert all classified state agency lawyers into unclassified employees; this will lessen their job protection as outline by the civil service act. The Committee on Appropriations will work this bill later this week.

 

For more information and to find other bills please review the updated Bill Tracking Chart at http://ksbar.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=363.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

First Adjournment Push Begins

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Last week was a short week for legislators after coming back from a four-day break following "turnaround.” Turnaround marked the last time bills could be passed out of its House of Origins and continue through the legislative process towards the governor’s desk. However, both chambers recognize that First Adjournment is only three weeks away and they have a host of issues to resolve before they head off for spring break. The most pressing is budget and tax items, and neither side has completed the budget process. The House Committee on Appropriations continues to review subcommittee reports from various state agencies; this means a competed product is not far off. However, it has almost become tradition for both chambers to push the final budget write-up into the veto session, which starts on May 8.

Quick Take:

On Monday, March 25 the KBA and the Kansas Association of County and District Attorneys will hosted the second Lunch & Learn with Lawyer-Legislators at the Kansas Capitol. This event allows lawyer-legislators to receive 1.0 hour of ethics and professionalism CLE credit without leaving the Capitol. The KBA hopes to provide our hardworking and time-depraved lawyer-legislators with additional opportunities to receive CLE credit during the session.

 

The most pressing KBA issue is HB 2019, which eliminates the nominating commission and replaces it with a Senate confirmation process for only the Kansas Court of Appeals. Last week, HB 2019 was referred to the Committee of the Whole in the Senate, and this means HB 2019 will bypass the committee hearing process and be debated on the floor of the Kansas Senate. The Senate will convene today at 2:30 p.m. to debate on HB 2019.

 

The KBA has been following several bills and their current statuses are as follows:

  • SB 81, requiring the restriction of certain officials' information from publicly accessible records, passed out of the Kansas Senate on a 40-0 vote and is set for hearing in the House on March 11 (KBA supports this bill);
  • HB 2014, revoking an ex-spouses inheritance rights upon divorce, passed the Kansas House 119-0 (KBA supports this bill); and HB 2015, marital property, passed the Kansas House 116-8 (KBA supports this bill) both set for hearing in the Senate on March 13 (KBA supports this bill);
  • HB 2012, commission on judicial performance, sunset in 2017, did not advance out of the Kansas House;
  • HB 2205, adoption hearings, time and waiver of notice, passed the Kansas House 123-0 (KBA supports this bill); and
  • HB 2233, protective parent reform act, did not advance out of the Kansas House (KBA opposed this bill).

In addition, post-turnaround hearings focus on state budget issues. For the next several weeks we can anticipate a number of bills that set up fiscal budgets for various state agencies and for the Judicial Branch. These bills include:

  • SB 218, entire amount of docket fees shall be credited to the judicial branch docket fee fund, created in this bill, with certain exceptions; extending the judicial branch surcharge for two years;
  • HB 2338, judicial branch docket fee; and
  • HB 2377, relating to court fees and cost, judicial branch surcharge fund (KBA supports the surcharge); and Judicial Budget subcommittee report.

Interestingly, last week proposal from the Committee on Appropriations called for the diverting of attorney registration fees from the Bar Disciplinary Fund to pay for e-filing and e-courts. The proposal, introduced by Rep. Degraaf and supported by Rep. Mark Kahrs, would sweep attorney registration fees for FY 2014 and FY 2015. The two-year approach to budgeting was implemented by the governor, which accounts for the sweeps lasting two cycles. The idea is to use $1.1 million in FY 2014 and $600,000 in 2015 to complete statewide e-filing. The remainder will be used to accelerate statewide e-courts. The committee believes that accelerated e-courts will allow the Judicial Branch to experience savings sooner rather than later. There is no hard data that indicates when the savings will materialize.

 

Also of interest is HB 2384, on July 1, 2013, all new hires and state agency attorneys, supervisors and positions that perform information technology functions are unclassified; certain exceptions. What HB 2384 proposes to accomplish is the conversion of all classified state agency lawyers into unclassified employees. This will lessen their job protection as outline by the civil service act. The hearing was held on Monday, March 11. For more information, see http://cjonline.com/news/2013-03-08/committee-postpones-hearing-unclassifying-workers and the testimony both for and against this bill at http://ksbar.org/associations/13344/files/Proctor_HB2384Testimony.pdf.

 

Finally, the Kansas Revised Limited Liability Companies Act proposal crafted by the KBA has been introduced into the House Committee on Federal and State Affairs; it is listed as HB 2398. This bill is not online yet but should be by tomorrow. No hearing is set but I am working with the chair to schedule a hearing for the week of March 18.

 

For more information and to find other bills please review the updated Bill Tracking Chart online at http://bit.ly/KBABillTrackingChart.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Turn Around

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013

On Friday, March 1 the Kansas legislature completed the first half of the 2013 legislative session. This deadline marks the last time bills could be passed out of its House of Origins and continued through the legislative process toward the governor’s desk. Both chambers made serious headway in that regard by debating and passing more than 85 bills. The Kansas House worked an amazing 50 bills on Thursday and Friday before heading out. The Kansas Senate made much quicker work of their agenda and the majority of senators left Thursday evening with only leadership showing up on Friday to hold a news conference.

Quick Take:

As mentioned above the Kansas House passed HB 2019 dealing with the Kansas Court of Appeals on a 73-50 vote. Here are the votes of each House member:

Yeas: Barker, Bideau, Boldra, Bradford, Bruchman, Brunk, Couture-Lovelady, Campbell, Carlson, Carpenter, Cassidy, Christmann, Claeys, Corbet, Crum, DeGraaf, Dove, Edmonds, Edwards, Esau, Ewy, Gandhi, Garber, Goico, Gonzalez, Grosserode, Hedke, Hermanson, Highland, Hildabrand, Hoffman, Houser, Howell, Huebert, Hutton, Johnson, Jones, Kahrs, Kelley, Kinzer, Kleeb, Lunn, Macheers, Mast, McPherson, Meigs, Merrick, Montgomery, O'Brien, Osterman, Peck, Petty, J. Powell, Proehl, Read, Rhoades, Rothlisberg, Rubin, Ryckman Jr., Ryckman Sr., Schroeder, Schwab, Schwartz, Seiwert, Shultz, Suellentrop, Sutton, Swanson, Thimesch, Todd, Vickrey, Waymaster, Weber.

Nays: Alcala, Alford, Ballard, Becker, Bollier, Bridges, Burroughs, Carlin, Clayton, Concannon, Davis, Dierks, Dillmore, Doll, Finch, Finney, Frownfelter, Grant, Hawkins, Henderson, Henry, Hibbard, Hill, Hineman, Houston, Jennings, Kelly, Kuether, Lane, Lusk, Meier, Menghini, Moxley, Pauls, Perry, Peterson, Phillips, Rooker, Ruiz, Sawyer, Sloan, Sloop, Tietze, Trimmer, Victors, Ward, Weigel, Whipple, Winn, Wolfe Moore.

 

KBA members should be aware that the Kansas House passed a bill that will allow the governor to appoint Kansas Court of Appeal judges with the consent of the Kansas Senate. This bill, HB 2019, was passed on a 73-50 vote. The Kansas Court of Appeals is a statutory creation allowing a change to take place with a simple majority—63 votes. The KBA strongly opposed this effort, and you can find more information on HB 2019 and other proposals to alter merit selection at http://ksbar.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=346.

 

In March the Kansas legislature will be working on budget items, tax policy, and a host of social issues. The Kansas judicial budget will get hammered out starting on Wednesday in House Appropriations Committee. This committee has floated the idea of sweeping attorney registration fees in order to pay for statewide e-filing and to fund a number of DUI refusal clerks. This idea was discussed last year when the Judicial Branch was underwater $1.1 million. Leadership wanted to sweep funds to close that hole; however, Chief Justice Nuss declined to dip into those dollars. This caused a one-day furlough before the legislature appropriated supplements funds. How this plays out remains to be seen.

 

Besides HB 2019, the KBA monitored a number of other bills to determine if they would advance in the legislative process. These bills include:

  • SB 4, statute of limitations for certain sexually violent crimes, did not advance out of the Kansas Senate;
  • SB 81, requiring the restriction of certain officials' information from publicly accessible records, passed out of the Kansas Senate on a 40-0 vote;
  • SB 124, restraint of trade, passed out of the Kansas Senate on a 36-4 vote;
  • SB 167, eliminating the statute of limitations for prosecutions of rape, passed out of the Kansas Senate on a 40-0 vote;
  • HB 2014, revoking an ex-spouses inheritance rights upon divorce, passed the Kansas House 119-0 (KBA supports this bill);
  • HB 2015, marital property, passed the Kansas House 116-8 (KBA supports this bill);
  • HB 2102, commission on judicial performance, sunset in 2017, did not advance out of the Kansas House;
  • HB 2205, adoption hearings, time and waiver of notice, passed the Kansas House 123-0 (KBA supports this bill);
  • HB 2233, protective parent reform act did not advance out of the Kansas House (KBA opposed this bill); and
  • HB 2254, relating to the determination of paternity did not advance out of the Kansas House (KBA opposed this bill).

In addition, a number of bills have been placed into exempt committees and continue through the process; they include:

  • SB 218, entire amount of docket fees shall be credited to the judicial branch docket fee fund, created in this bill, with certain exceptions; extending the judicial branch surcharge for two years;
  • HB 2338, judicial branch docket fee;
  • HB 2355, enacting the Kansas fair tax act of 2013;
  • HB 2376, Kansas apology and disclosure of unanticipated medical outcomes and medical errors; and
  • HB 2377, relating to court fees and cost, judicial branch surcharge fund.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Snowmageddon Interrupts Turnaround

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013
This week marks the first large deadline of the 2013 Session, Turnaround! This deadline forces both chambers to pass out any bills they wish to have the other chamber work when the session resumes next week. However, the recent run of bad weather has pushed meeting dates into the weekend as the legislature tries to find as much free time as possible before the hammer drops of the first half of the session. Committees will continue to meet throughout the week with the House possibly coming in on Saturday to wrap up any loose ends. If inclement weather persists, look for the deadline to be moved back till next week. The legislature originally had next Monday and Tuesday off.

Quick Take:

The Kansas Legislature has reached its halfway point of the 2013 session with the passage of the House of Origin deadline, marking the date in which all non-exempt legislation must advance out of its House of Origin, or is considered dead for the remainder of the session. However, several exempt committees continue to work through legislative proposals. These exempt committees include House Appropriations, Senate Ways and Means, House and Senate Federal and State Affairs, and House Taxation. The House and Senate Judiciary committees are not exempt committees and all legislation not passed out today will have to wait until next session.

 

A number of bills will be worked in House Judiciary this week. They include the following:

  • HB 2019, court of appeals judges; appointment by the governor, confirmation by the senate. This bill was passed out of House Judiciary Committee on Monday. The entire House will consider this bill later this week.
  • HB 2102, Commission on Judicial performance, Sunset 2017, docket fees reduced. This bill was gutted during House Judiciary consideration and will not proceed as originally introduced.
  • HB 2116, civil procedure, electronic service of process.
  • HB 2182, relating to grand juries.
  • HB 2203, relating to exercise of religion. This bill was passed out of House Judiciary Committee on Monday.
  • HB 2204, relating to exercise of real property.
  • HB 2205, adoption hearing; time and waiver of notice; This bill was passed out of House Judiciary on Monday. The KBA supported this bill.
  • SB 8, creating the Kansas commission on judicial qualifications. This bill was passed out of the House Judiciary Committee on Monday.

Look for these bills to work their way through the Kansas House this week or the weekend.

 

In addition, look for hearing on a number of judicial branch bills, which includes:

  • SB 218, entire amount of docket fees shall be credited to the judicial branch docket fee fund, created in this bill, with certain exceptions; extending the judicial branch surcharge for two years.
  • HB 2338, judicial branch docket fee.
  • HB 2377, relating to court fees and cost, judicial branch surcharge fund. A hearing is set for Wednesday, February 27 at 9 a.m. in the Committee on Appropriations.

Also of importance is HB 2355, enacting the Kansas Fair Tax Act of 2013. The KBA opposed a similar provision in 2012.

 

Agriculture attorneys may be interested in the following:

  • HB 2292, limiting nuisance actions against certain agricultural activities.

Attached please find litigation proposals that may be of interest to you:

  • HB 2376, Kansas apology and disclosure of unanticipated medical outcomes and medical errors.
  • HB 2341, allowing court reporters licensed in another state to take depositions in Kansas.
  • HB 2315, relating to trespass and liability exceptions.

Oil and gas lawyers may be interested in this proposal:

  • SB 206, abolishing the oil and gas valuation depletion trust fund. Allowing the counties to retain funds already in such county's oil and gas valuation depletion trust fund.

Probate attorneys may find interesting:

  • HB 2014, revoking an ex-spouses inheritance rights upon divorce; passed the Kansas House 119-0. The KBA supported this bill.
  • HB 2166, real and personal property relating to the medical assistance recovery act. A subcommittee reviewed this bill and has submitted a substitute proposal.

Real estate and title lawyers may wish to review the following bills:

  • HB 2347, mortgage registration fees, verification of indebtedness.
  • HB 2360, stays of mortgage foreclosures proceedings against service members.
  • SB 81, requiring the restriction of certain officials' information from publicly accessible records, which passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee as amended.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Busy Week for the Kansas Supreme Court

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Last week the Kansas Supreme Court testified on the two bills amending the one judge per county requirement. These bills, HB 2016 and HB 2113, repeal the one judge per county requirement and allow judges to be reassigned around the state. Chief Judge Richard Smith and Chief Judge David King testified in support of both bills. Both judges believe in the efficient allocation of judicial resources and removing this barrier will allow the Supreme Court the flexibility to deal with mounting caseload issues in more populated areas. Judge Smith and Judge King’s testimony can be reviewed here.

Quick Take:

The Kansas Bar Association will be hosting another Lunch & Learn with Lawyer-Legislators CLE. This CLE will take place on Monday, March 25 from 11:30-12:50. KBA member Larry Zimmerman will provide an hour of Free Ethics CLE dealing with social media, advertising and iCloud storage issues.

 

Opposition to these bills were varied but organized. The District Magistrate Judge Association opposed both bills as did Kansas Farm Bureau, several Law Enforcement Organizations and the Kansas Legislative Policy Group. You can find opposition testimony here.

 

The most interesting discussion during the hearing was the conceptual amendment to reduce the number of district court judges in those high case load districts and replace them with magistrate judges. District Magistrate Judge Ann Dixson argued that a magistrate judge has jurisdiction to hear 91% of the cases filed in court. However, a District Magistrate Judge’s salary is only $61,755.00, approximately half of what a District Judge earns. In addition, a Magistrate Judge operates without support staff or Court Reporters. Given these added costs and the annual salary of a District Judge, Dixson believes that three (3) Magistrate Judges could replace one (1) District Judge and their support staff without increasing the budget or affecting access to justice. She also stated that this conversion could be done through attrition and in the interim magistrate judges could travel to these high caseload areas to help out for a week or so at a time.

 

What steps the House Judiciary Committee takes regarding this bill and conceptual amendment is hard to say but it is important to remember that four members of this committee were judges. Rep. Steven Becker (R-Hutchinson) is a retired District Judge; Rep. Russ Jenning (R-Lakin) and Rep. John Barker(R-Abilene) are former District Magistrate judges; and; Rep. Marshall Christmann (R-Lyons) is a municipal court judge.

 

Agriculture attorneys may be interested in the following:

HB 2049, Kansas department of agriculture; increasing certain fees and eliminating sunsets on various program fees;

SB 153, Water; dams; definition; exemption from permit requirements; inspection costs and penalties;

SB 146, Agriculture; changing the definition of "on-farm retail sales of milk or milk products.

 

In the coming days a number of family law bills will be given hearings. They include:

HB 2205, Adoption hearings, time and waiver of notice; February 13 @ 3:30 pm in the House Judiciary Committee, Rm 112-N; and;

HB 2233, Protective Parent Reform Act, February 21 @ 9:00am in the House Committee on children and seniors, Rm 218-N;

HB 2254, Relating to the determination of paternity; and HB 2259, service of process in divorce actions have not been set at this time.

 

Please find litigation proposals that may be of interest to you:

HB 2224 was introduced to reverse a recent Kansas Supreme Court decision, O’Brien v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., No. 101,000, 2012 WL1563976 (Kan. Sup. Ct., May 4, 2012). Proponents of this bill argued for a return to the establish standard of "rule of reason” to judge whether or not an agreement violated the restraint of trade act. Opponents of the bill argued that the bill would alter existing laws not addressed by the O’Brien decision and cause detrimental effect to consumers. Other restraint of trade bills that were introduced include SB 123; SB 124; HB 2225; HB 2258, and HB 2275. The KBA took a neutral position on these bills.

 

Oil and Gas lawyers may be interested in this proposal:

HB 2262, Abolishing the oil and gas valuation depletion trust fund

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Kansas Senate Passes Merit Selection Reform Measure

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013

On Wednesday, January 30, the Kansas Senate debated SCR 1601 and its trailer bill SB 8. SCR 1601 would eliminate the Supreme Court Nominating Commission and replace it with the federal model for selecting judges and justices in Kansas. Sen. Jeff King (R-Independence) carried and supported SCR 1601 and SB 8. Several opponents of the measure attempted to amend SCR 1601. The most discussed issue was whether to have the election in the primary or general election; this issue would go to the voters during the August 2014 primary. Opponents of SCR 1601 wanted the election moved to the general election three months later in November. King and others argued that the primary was the first available election and that it should be set in August. Historically, primary elections have a much lower voter turnout. For instance, in the 2012 general election voter turnout was 66.8 percent as opposed to the primary turnout which was 23.2 percent. This trend was also seen in the 2010 elections where the general election turnout was 49.7 percent compared to 25.3 percent in the primary. Even after these statistics were discussed, the Senate voted down a proposed move 26-14. It should be noted that the House plan (HCR 5002) provides that the election will be held during the general election in November 2014.

Quick Take:

On January 31, 2013, Chief Justice Lawton Nuss released the State of the Judiciary report. This report highlighted the judicial branch’s ongoing budget issues, statewide e-filing program, and the Court’s 2014 budget request. You may view the entire report online at http://bit.ly/SOJ2013.

 

Two other amendments were offered that clarified the explanatory statement that accompanies SCR 1601 and both of these amendments passed on a voice vote. SCR 1601 was placed on Emergency Final Action and passed 28-12. The following is a breakdown on how each senator voted on this issue.

 

On roll call, the vote was: Yeas, 28; Nays, 12; Present and Passing, 0; Absent or Not Voting, 0.

 

Yeas: Abrams, Apple, Arpke, Bowers, Bruce, Denning, Donovan, Fitzgerald, Holmes, Kerschen, King, Knox, LaTurner, Longbine, Love, Lynn, Masterson, Melcher, ODonnell, Olson, Ostmeyer, Petersen, Pilcher-Cook, Powell, Pyle, Smith, Tyson, Wagle.

 

Nays: Emler, Faust-Goudeau, Francisco, Haley, Hawk, Hensley, Holland, Kelly, McGinn, Pettey, V. Schmidt, Wolf.

 

If you would like to learn more about these proposals, you may find that information online at http://bit.ly/meritselection. Next week the Supreme Court will be debating their one judge per county bill, along with Rep. Lance Kinzer’s one judge proposal. That hearing is set for 3:30 p.m. on Thursday, February 7. See Pages 27-28, http://bit.ly/2013DailyHouseCalendar. Both of these bills (HB 2016 and HB 2113) would allow the Supreme Court to reassign judges. The main difference that is Kinzer’s bill (HB 2016) has a hard 600 case cap that would trigger reassignment. The Supreme Court proposal (HB 2113) would simply give the Supreme Court authority to reassign as they deemed necessary.

 

The Supreme Court has also introduced a bill that would allow for the creation of an E-Filing Technology Fund. This bill (HB 2117) allows the Supreme Court to set the fee for e-filing. This bill is similar to last year’s version, but it does not request a specific dollar amount. It simply requests authority to place an "additional fee” on various surcharge fees and assign those newly collected fee to the E-Filing Technology Fund.

 

Please find the following litigation proposals that may be of interest to you:

  • SB 73, Workers compensation: administrative duties of secretary of health and environment; citizenship status; administrative judge disqualification; limitation of actions; workplace health and safety program;
  • SB 89, Interest on judgments in civil actions;
  • SB 90, Amending private remedies under the Kansas consumer protection act; and
  • HB 2173, Civil procedure: Remote claims on commercial property; state construction registry

Judicial branch proposals include:

  • HB 2102, Commission on judicial performance, sunset in 2017;
  • HB 2113, Relating to judges; authority of supreme court; and
  • HB 2117, Relating to court fees and costs; judiciary technology fund

Oil and gas lawyers may be interested in this proposal:

  • HB 2138, Repealing statutes related to oil and gas

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Merit Selection Reform Makes a Big Move

Posted By Joseph N. Molina III, Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Proponents of merit selection reform had a very good week as both the Senate and House judiciary committees passed their version of the Federal Model out of committee. Actually the Senate Judiciary Committee passed two bills, SCR 1601 and SB 8, which will aid in the elimination of the current judicial selection process. There were no real surprises in the Senate Judiciary Committee as passage of these bills were seen as a foregone conclusion but there was some technical fixes that were needed before the committee could move SB 8 out. The technical fix involved the naming of the new seven-member commission created in SB 8. As introduced the seven-member commission was called the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications. However, the Supreme Court already has a commission with that name looking into complaints levied against judges so the new commission needed a name change. The Senate Judiciary Committee settled on the Kansas Commission on Judicial Nominations.

Quick Take:

On Monday, January 28 the KBA hosted the first Lunch & Learn with Lawyer-Legislators at the Kansas Capitol. This event allowed lawyer-legislators to receive 1.0 hour of CLE credit without leaving the Capitol. Many thanks to the Capitol staff and to Sen. Jeff King for making this event a success. The KBA hopes to provide our hardworking and time depraved lawyer-legislators with additional opportunities to receive CLE credit during the session.

 

Things in the House Judiciary Committee were a little more dramatic as Rep. Jim Ward (D-Wichita) made a motion to pass out of committee the KBA’s 4-5-6 Plan instead of the Federal Model plan that was under consideration. The Ward amendment failed 10-12. Out of the 10-committee members voting in favor of the 4-5-6 Plan, five were Republicans. This is a good sign as we move into the votes on the House floor. However, the original federal model proposal, HCR 5002, was passed on a voice vote. There was a significant amendment to HCR 5002 that moved the election date from the August primary to the November general election. The Senate considered this amendment but failed to pass it.

 

Later this week the Senate will consider SCR 1601 and SB 8 in General Orders with Final Action probably the following day. The House will likely debate this issue next week but a timetable is not set yet. If you are interested in contacting your legislator to express your thoughts on merit selection reform you can locate your legislator using the link below: http://ksbar.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=341.

 

If you would lie to learn more about these proposals you can find that information here: http://ksbar.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=346.

 

Besides merit selection there will be two hearings next week dealing with probate issues. These bills, HB 2014, revoking an ex-spouses inheritance rights upon divorce, and HB 2015, domestic relations relating to marital property, will be heard on Thursday, January 31 at 3:30 p.m. in Rm. 346-S by the House Judiciary Committee.

 

You should also be interested in three bills dealing with the Supreme Court. The first is HB 2016, which would repeal the one judge per county requirement. This bill was introduced by Rep. Lance Kinzer and allows the Supreme Court to reassign a magistrate judge from a district with less than 600 non-traffic cases per year. The reassignment would come as judges retired. The Supreme Court has introduced their own one judge per county bill but it would simply give the chief justice the authority to reassign judges with no set timetable. This is very similar to what they introduced last year. The Supreme Court also introduced a bill that would allow them to create an e-filing fee fund.

 

Agriculture attorneys may find these bills interesting:

  • HB 2049, Kansas department of agriculture; increasing certain fees and eliminating sunsets on various program fees; and
  • SB 57, agriculture; powers and duties of the department of agriculture relating to animal health.

Attorneys with a criminal law practice should pay attention to the following bills:

  • SB 61, human trafficking;
  • SB 66, requiring the collection and publication of district attorney criminal and juvenile offender caseload data;
  • HB 2041, criminal history record information; definition; municipal court reporting; district court reporting;
  • HB 2043, aggravated battery; driving under the influence; and
  • HB 2093, amending the crime of ID theft.

Lawyers interested in elder law and/or health law should review the following:

  • HB 2068, Kansas death with dignity act.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 13 of 14
 |<   <<   <  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14
more Calendar

1/25/2018
Lunch & Learn: Use of Electronic Evidence in Litigation

Vendor Marketplace

Featured Jobs
Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal